Publish ETF claims with evidence you can defend.

LensVest turns one concrete ETF story into an artifact-backed supportability review, safer wording, and evidence-boundary notes before you publish.

Submit a claim for reviewView the full report
Pilot

For independent ETF publishers preparing an article, video, newsletter, or research post.

Creator-pack evidence preview

One evidence-led artifact from the public LQQ supportability review, ready to inspect before any custom creator scope is confirmed.

Decisive evidence

Mixed

Does a capped LQQ sleeve improve robustness?

A monthly 90.00% PUST and 10.00% LQQ fixed contribution recipe, capped at 20.00% with annual trim only, was more robust than monthly PUST across the tested history.

Endpoint and drawdown

PUST baseline terminal value167,445.36 EUR
Capped-sleeve terminal value178,940.17 EUR
PUST baseline max drawdown-31.1%
Capped-sleeve max drawdown-34.2%

Completed rolling windows

36 months91.7%

77 candidate leads across 84 completed windows

60 months100%

60 candidate leads across 60 completed windows

Report-derived values are formatted for readability; the chart does not derive a stronger verdict.

Mixed: the capped sleeve finished at 178940.17 EUR versus 167445.36 EUR, with rolling evidence meeting both sufficiency gates.

Educational historical evidence only; no investment action follows.

View source and evidence boundaries

Actual product history: Actual official product NAV history was used. Purchase prices are modeled same-date NAV proxies, not observed exchange executions or investor performance, and the valuation calendar can affect results.

Open the full public report

Safer wording

Keep the conclusion inside the evidence

Across the tested shared product history, the exact 90.00% core, 10.00% satellite, 20.00% cap, and annual trim only recipe finished above the PUST baseline. Unitized drawdown and completed rolling windows show how dependent that result was on the reviewed period.

What is not proven

  • The observed comparison does not establish the same result outside the tested history.
  • The evidence does not determine a suitable allocation for an individual investor.
  • No alternative weights, caps, or schedules were tested.
  • The modeled NAV purchase prices are not observed exchange executions or an investor-performance record.

Available now

  • Public report page
  • Reader-friendly endpoint, drawdown, and rolling-window values
  • Publication-safe wording
  • Evidence and source boundary

Scoped after review

  • Creator-pack evidence selection
  • Custom caption and wording

Planned

  • Downloadable Markdown
  • HTML embed
  • Social image export

The evidence pack, at a glance

Each element stays tied to the checked claim, its sources, and the evidence boundary the report can defend.

  • Decisive evidence
  • Publication-safe caption
  • Safer wording
  • Evidence and source boundary
  • Method boundary

From one claim to a defensible scope

Public reports are free to read. Custom creator work is scoped only after supportability review and may be paid.

LensVest confirms the evidence boundary before any paid scope. A submission does not guarantee acceptance, publication, or delivery.

  1. 1

    Submit one claim.

  2. 2

    LensVest checks evidence supportability.

  3. 3

    Eligible work receives a confirmed creator-pack scope.

Bring one ETF claim to the evidence desk

Start with the exact story you want to publish. LensVest checks what the available evidence can support before confirming any creator-pack scope.

Submit a claim for reviewView the full report